1.
|
We note your response to comment 1 in our letter dated November 10, 2010, and we reissue in part our prior comment. Section (a)(2) of Rule 419 defines a blank check company as a company that is issuing penny stock that is “a development stage company that has no specific business plan or purpose or has indicated that its business plan is to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company or companies, or other entity.” In discussing this definition in the adopting release, the Commission stated that it would “scrutinize… offerings for attempts to create the appearance that the registrant …has a specific business plan, in an effort to avoid the application of rule 419.” See Securities Act Release No. 33-6932 (April 28, 1992).
|
2.
|
We note your response to comment 2 in our letter dated November 10, 2010 that you do not believe that your registration statement should be filed on form S-11. It is unclear from your disclosure in the registration statement and response whether the company will acquire and hold real estate. Please revise to clearly disclose this aspect of your business. Again, if the company intends to acquire and hold real estate, your registration statement should be filed on Form S-11.
|
3.
|
We note your response to comment 3 in our letter dated November 10, 2010 and we reissue in part our prior comment. It appears that you are registering this transaction as a resale pursuant to Rule 415 (a)(1)(i) of Regulation C. We note that this registration statement was filed a short period after the selling shareholders had purchased their shares. In light of this factor, please provide us an analysis explaining your basis for relying on Rule 415(a)(1)(i) and concluding that this transaction is not being conducted by or on behalf of the issuer. Refer to Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations, Securities Act Rules, Question 612.09. In addition, please include disclosure on the cover page of the prospectus and in the distribution section that the selling shareholders may be deemed underwriters.
|
4.
|
We note your response to comment 5 of our letter dated November 10, 2010, and we reissue that comment. Please provide us with highlighted copies of any reports on which you rely. Alternatively, please file consents for the parties providing this information as exhibits to the registration statement. As an example, we note you cite the Mortgage Bankers Association, First American Real Estate Solutions and professional Realtors on page 13. In addition, please revise to identify who or what “professional Realtors” is. Please also identify whether the information provided to you by “professional Realtors” is publicly available or whether it was prepared for you.
|
5.
|
Please explain the revised disclosure on page 1 that “[you] have not yet acquired any properties…” Does the company intend to acquire properties?
|
6.
|
We note your revised disclosure on page 1 that “[y]our activities to date have been investigative in nature and [you] are identifying prospects and evaluating their revenue potentials.” Please explain this statement and describe these activities in greater detail in the business section. For example, have you been investigating, identifying or evaluating potential business acquisitions or properties?
|
7.
|
We note on page 2 that you provide a cross-reference to the Risk Factors and you indicate that they begin on page 7. We further note that the Risk Factors begin on page 4. Please revise accordingly.
|
8.
|
We note you indicate that if you cannot obtain sufficient funding you may have to delay the implementation of your business strategy. Please revise to also indicate the risk that you may have to cease operations if you are unable to obtain sufficient funding.
|
9.
|
We note you indicate that there is no assurance that management of the company will be successful in completing the company’s business development with lenders. Please clarify.
|
10.
|
We note you indicate that you have sustained net losses of $37,925 for the period from inception through June 30, 2010. We further note that your unaudited Condensed Statements of Operations on page F-13 indicates that you have sustained net losses of $63,646 for the period from inception through September 30, 2010. Therefore, please update this risk factor to indicate your net losses through September 30, 2010.
|
11.
|
This risk factor appears to state a general risk or generic facts about your business. Please revise to clarify how this risk is specific to your company or revise to remove this risk factor.
|
12.
|
We note that you have not expanded this risk factor to clarify how falling interest rates or mortgage assistance to holders at risk of foreclosure could adversely affect the company’s business. Therefore, we reissue comment 16 in letter dated November 10, 2010.
|
13.
|
We note that you refer to a “senior exchange” in this risk factor’s subheading. Please clarify.
|
14.
|
We note you indicate that the common shares being offered for resale consist of your common stock held by 44 shareholders. We further note the table of shareholders that you provide on page 10 lists less than44 shareholders. Please revise or advise.
|
15.
|
It appears that Mr. Coker, one of your officers and directors, has the same last name and may be related to one other selling shareholder listed on page 10. To the extent these shareholders are related, Mr. Coker may be deemed to beneficially own share held by this relative. Please see our Exchange Act Sections 13(d) and 13(g) and Regulation 13D-G Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation 105.05 and revise your table as needed.
|
16.
|
We note you indicated on page 13 that lenders are motivated to sell properties and that below-market value properties represent a significant business opportunity as owners are being forced to sell these properties at bargain prices. Please clarify whether you will continue to attempt to purchase foreclosed properties.
|
17.
|
Please revise to explain what you mean by your company’s “portfolio of properties.”
|
18.
|
We note that you have not disclosed whether your have identified any specific properties for acquisition and the location of those properties. Therefore, we reissue comment 20 in our letter dated November 10, 2010. Please also disclose whether you have identified any specific properties for rental or renovation services.
|
19.
|
We note you indicate on page 14 that Ms. Lovig works 30 hours per week as the general contractor. Please disclose whether you are currently renovating any properties and, if so, the location of any such properties.
|
20.
|
We note you indicate that you have approached larger real estate developers and hedge funds that own or are looking to purchase REO properties. Please indicate whether you have entered into any contracts with real estate developers or hedge funds to act as a property manager or to provide services such as renovation and rental management.
|
21.
|
Answer: The Company has not entered into any contracts with real estate developers or hedge funds to act as a property manager or to provide services such as renovation and rental management.
|
22.
|
We note you indicate in Note 6 on page F-10 that on September 24, 2010 you entered into an agreement with a third party to purchase the rights of a license. Please discuss any license or royalty agreements that you have and please file them as exhibits or tell us why it is not appropriate.
|
23.
|
We note you indicate on page 15 that you face competition from many individuals and companies seeking to capitalize on the foreclosure boom. Please revise to describe your company’s competitive position in the industry and methods of competition.
|
24.
|
We note you have not provided details of your specific plan of operations for the next 12 months, including detailed milestones, the anticipated time frame for beginning and completing each milestone, the estimated expenses associated with each milestone and the expected sources of such funding. Therefore, we reissue comment 25 in our letter dated November 10, 2010.
|
25.
|
Your disclosure under this heading indicates that you have sufficient capital to continue operations into 2011. This appears to be inconsistent with the going concern issue noted in your auditors’ opinion and your disclosure on pages 4, F-9, and F-19. Please reconcile for us this discrepancy.
|
26.
|
We note your response to comment 26 in our letter dated November 10, 2010. We further note that you indicate in the risk factor “we need additional capital,” on page 4, that you will likely seek additional financing. Therefore, we reissue the comment. Given your auditor’s going concern opinion, please revise your disclosure to be more specific concerning the sources of your liquidity for the next 12 months. For example, if you plan to issue additional equity, you should disclose your plans to do so. If you plan to incur debt obligations, you should disclose whether you have identified any potential lenders.
|
27.
|
We note in paragraph five on page 16 you indicate that over the next 12 months you plan to focus primarily on finding institutions willing to lend into this market. Please revise to clarify.
|
28.
|
We note that you have not clarified which specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills led to the conclusion that Ms. Lovig and Mr. Coker should serve as directors for the registrant. Therefore, we reissue comment 28 in our letter dated November 10, 2010. Please see Item 401(e) of Regulation S-K.
|
29.
|
We note you indicate that you sold, through a Regulation D Rule 506 private offering, common stock to 44 investors, and that you set forth the identity of persons to whom you sold these shares on page II-2. We further note that you do not identify 44 investors in the table. Please revise or advise.
|
30.
|
We note you did not indicate the date on which Ms. Lovig signed the registration statement as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer.
|
·
|
should the Commission of the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, declare the filing effective, it does not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing;
|
·
|
the action of the Commission of the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, in declaring the filing effective, does not relieve the company from its full responsibility for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; and
|
·
|
the company may not assert staff comments and the declaration of effectiveness as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
|